<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.fibrogenesis.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair</description>
        <dc:date>2012-01-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/5/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/1/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/2/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/3/1/21" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/3/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/4/1/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/2/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/3/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/4/1/26" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/4/1/4" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/5/1/1">
        <title>Genomics and proteomics in liver fibrosis and cirrhosis
</title>
        <description>Genomics and proteomics have become increasingly important in biomedical science in the past decade, as they provide an opportunity for hypothesis-free experiments that can yield major insights not previously foreseen when scientific and clinical questions are based only on hypothesis-driven approaches. Use of these tools, therefore, opens new avenues for uncovering physiological and pathological pathways. Liver fibrosis is a complex disease provoked by a range of chronic injuries to the liver, among which are viral hepatitis, (non-) alcoholic steatohepatitis and autoimmune disorders. Some chronic liver patients will never develop fibrosis or cirrhosis, whereas others rapidly progress towards cirrhosis in a few years. This variety can be caused by disease-related factors (for example, viral genotype) or host-factors (genetic/epigenetic). It is vital to establish accurate tools to identify those patients at highest risk for disease severity or progression in order to determine who are in need of immediate therapies. Moreover, there is an urgent imperative to identify non-invasive markers that can accurately distinguish mild and intermediate stages of fibrosis. Ideally, biomarkers can be used to predict disease progression and treatment response, but these studies will take many years due to the requirement for lengthy follow-up periods to assess outcomes. Current genomic and proteomic research provides many candidate biomarkers, but independent validation of these biomarkers is lacking, and reproducibility is still a key concern. Thus, great opportunities and challenges lie ahead in the field of genomics and proteomics, which, if successful, could transform the diagnosis and treatment of chronic fibrosing liver diseases.</description>
        <link>http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/5/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Rebekka Hannivoort</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Virginia Hernandez-Gea</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Scott Friedman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair 2012, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-1536-5-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-1536-5-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-1536</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/1/1/5">
        <title>Redox mechanisms in hepatic chronic wound healing and fibrogenesis  </title>
        <description>Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated within cells or, more generally, in a tissue environment, may easily turn into a source of cell and tissue injury. Aerobic organisms have developed evolutionarily conserved mechanisms and strategies to carefully control the generation of ROS and other oxidative stress-related radical or non-radical reactive intermediates (that is, to maintain redox homeostasis), as well as to &apos;make use&apos; of these molecules under physiological conditions as tools to modulate signal transduction, gene expression and cellular functional responses (that is, redox signalling). However, a derangement in redox homeostasis, resulting in sustained levels of oxidative stress and related mediators, can play a significant role in the pathogenesis of major human diseases characterized by chronic inflammation, chronic activation of wound healing and tissue fibrogenesis. This review has been designed to first offer a critical introduction to current knowledge in the field of redox research in order to introduce readers to the complexity of redox signalling and redox homeostasis. This will include ready-to-use key information and concepts on ROS, free radicals and oxidative stress-related reactive intermediates and reactions, sources of ROS in mammalian cells and tissues, antioxidant defences, redox sensors and, more generally, the major principles of redox signalling and redox-dependent transcriptional regulation of mammalian cells. This information will serve as a basis of knowledge to introduce the role of ROS and other oxidative stress-related intermediates in contributing to essential events, such as the induction of cell death, the perpetuation of chronic inflammatory responses, fibrogenesis and much more, with a major focus on hepatic chronic wound healing and liver fibrogenesis.</description>
        <link>http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/1/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Erica Novo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maurizio Parola</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair 2008, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-10-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-1536-1-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-1536-1-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-1536</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-10-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/2/1/3">
        <title>Possible mechanisms of kidney repair</title>
        <description>In most adult epithelia the process of replacing damaged or dead cells is maintained through the presence of stem/progenitor cells, which allow epithelial tissues to be repaired following injury. Existing evidence strongly supports the presence of stem cells in the adult kidney. Indeed, recent findings provide evidence in favour of a role for intrinsic renal cells and against a physiological role for bone marrow-derived stem cells in the regeneration of renal epithelial cells. In addition, recent studies have identified a subset of CD24+CD133+ renal progenitors within the Bowman&apos;s capsule of adult human kidney, which provides regenerative potential for injured renal epithelial cells. Intriguingly, CD24+CD133+ renal progenitors also represent common progenitors of tubular cells and podocytes during renal development. Chronic injury causes dysfunction of the tubular epithelial cells, which triggers the release of fibrogenic cytokines and recruitment of inflammatory cells to injured kidneys. The rapid interposition of scar tissue probably confers a survival advantage by preventing infectious microorganisms from invading the wound, but prevents subsequent tissue regeneration. However, the existence of renal epithelial progenitors in the kidney suggests a possible explanation for the regression of renal lesions which has been observed in experimental animals and even in humans. Thus, manipulation of the wound repair process in order to shift it towards regeneration will probably require the ability to slow the rapid fibrotic response so that renal progenitor cells can allow tissue regeneration rather than scar formation.</description>
        <link>http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/2/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Paola Romagnani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raghu Kalluri</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair 2009, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-1536-2-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-1536-2-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-1536</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/3/1/21">
        <title>Toll like receptor 4 signaling in liver injury and hepatic fibrogenesis</title>
        <description>Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a family of transmembrane pattern recognition receptors (PRR) that play a key role in innate and adaptive immunity by recognizing structural components unique to bacteria, fungi and viruses. TLR4 is the most studied of the TLRs, and its primary exogenous ligand is lipopolysaccharide, a component of Gram-negative bacterial walls. In the absence of exogenous microbes, endogenous ligands including damage-associated molecular pattern molecules from damaged matrix and injured cells can also activate TLR4 signaling. In humans, single nucleotide polymorphisms of the TLR4 gene have an effect on its signal transduction and on associated risks of specific diseases, including cirrhosis. In liver, TLR4 is expressed by all parenchymal and non-parenchymal cell types, and contributes to tissue damage caused by a variety of etiologies. Intact TLR4 signaling was identified in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), the major fibrogenic cell type in injured liver, and mediates key responses including an inflammatory phenotype, fibrogenesis and anti-apoptotic properties. Further clarification of the function and endogenous ligands of TLR4 signaling in HSCs and other liver cells could uncover novel mechanisms of fibrogenesis and facilitate the development of therapeutic strategies.</description>
        <link>http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/3/1/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Jinsheng Guo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Scott Friedman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair 2010, null:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-10-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-1536-3-21</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-1536-3-21-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-1536</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-10-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/3/1/5">
        <title>Procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) is a marker for fibrogenesis in bile duct ligation-induced fibrosis in rats</title>
        <description>Background:
Fibrosis can be described as the excess deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) components, such as collagens and proteoglycans. Fibrosis of the liver, which eventually leads to cirrhosis, is a major global health problem. Being able to measure fibrosis progression may enable timely preventative intervention. The aim of the current study was to investigate the utility of serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) as a marker of hepatic fibrosis, as distinct from bone formation, during three different periods of fibrosis development following hepatic injury induced by bile duct ligation (BDL) in rats.
Methods:
BDL was performed on 30 female Sprague-Dawley rats aged 6 months, and sham operations on 30 controls. Animals were killed after 14, 28, or 35 days. The extent of liver fibrosis was evaluated by quantitative histology after Sirus Red staining. Levels of serum PINP and osteocalcin (a marker solely for osteoblastic bone formation) were determined using ELISA at baseline and post termination.
Results:
Collagen formation increased by 30% compared to 3% in sham-operated animals (P &lt; 0.0001). PINP levels increased significantly in all BDL groups compared with baseline (14 days: baseline 13.9 ng/ml, termination 17.7 ng/ml, P = 0.047; 28 days: baseline 17.9 ng/ml, termination 26.2 ng/ml, P = 0.005; 35 days: baseline 18.0 ng/ml, termination 27.4 ng/ml P = 0.015, an increase of 52%). PINP levels did not change from baseline in the sham-operated rats, indicating that the increased PINP levels were due to hepatic injury. The bone-specific marker, osteocalcin, did not increase in either BDL or sham-operated rats. PINP measured in serum correlated to the extent of liver fibrosis as evaluated by quantitative histology (R2 = 0.42, P &lt; 0.001).
Conclusion:
PINP was associated with the development of liver fibrosis, but not bone formation, in mature rats subjected to BDL. Thus, PINP may be useful in studying the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis. However, caution should be applied when interpreting PINP levels in other disease states.</description>
        <link>http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/3/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Sanne Skovgard Veidal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Efstathios Vassiliadis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gervais Tougas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ben Vainer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Morten Asser Karsdal</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair 2010, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-1536-3-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-1536-3-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-1536</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/4/1/20">
        <title>Mesenchymal stem cells: from experiment to clinic</title>
        <description>There is currently much interest in adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their ability to differentiate into other cell types, and to partake in the anatomy and physiology of remote organs. It is now clear these cells may be purified from several organs in the body besides bone marrow. MSCs take part in wound healing by contributing to myofibroblast and possibly fibroblast populations, and may be involved in epithelial tissue regeneration in certain organs, although this remains more controversial. In this review, we examine the ability of MSCs to modulate liver, kidney, heart and intestinal repair, and we update their opposing qualities of being less immunogenic and therefore tolerated in a transplant situation, yet being able to contribute to xenograft models of human tumour formation in other contexts. However, such observations have not been replicated in the clinic. Recent studies showing the clinical safety of MSC in several pathologies are discussed. The possible opposing powers of MSC need careful understanding and control if their clinical potential is to be realised with long-term safety for patients.</description>
        <link>http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/4/1/20</link>
                <dc:creator>William Otto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nicholas Wright</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair 2011, null:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-09-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-1536-4-20</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-1536-4-20-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-1536</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-09-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/2/1/7">
        <title>Focus on collagen: in vitro systems to study fibrogenesis and antifibrosis -- state of the art </title>
        <description>Fibrosis represents a major global disease burden, yet a potent antifibrotic compound is still not in sight. Part of the explanation for this situation is the difficulties that both academic laboratories and research and development departments in the pharmaceutical industry have been facing in re-enacting the fibrotic process in vitro for screening procedures prior to animal testing. Effective in vitro characterization of antifibrotic compounds has been hampered by cell culture settings that are lacking crucial cofactors or are not holistic representations of the biosynthetic and depositional pathway leading to the formation of an insoluble pericellular collagen matrix. In order to appreciate the task which in vitro screening of antifibrotics is up against, we will first review the fibrotic process by categorizing it into events that are upstream of collagen biosynthesis and the actual biosynthetic and depositional cascade of collagen I. We point out oversights such as the omission of vitamin C, a vital cofactor for the production of stable procollagen molecules, as well as the little known in vitro tardy procollagen processing by collagen C-proteinase/BMP-1, another reason for minimal collagen deposition in cell culture. We review current methods of cell culture and collagen quantitation vis-&#224;-vis the high content options and requirements for normalization against cell number for meaningful data retrieval. Only when collagen has formed a fibrillar matrix that becomes cross-linked, invested with ligands, and can be remodelled and resorbed, the complete picture of fibrogenesis can be reflected in vitro. We show here how this can be achieved. A well thought-out in vitro fibrogenesis system represents the missing link between brute force chemical library screens and rational animal experimentation, thus providing both cost-effectiveness and streamlined procedures towards the development of better antifibrotic drugs.</description>
        <link>http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/2/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Clarice Chen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Raghunath</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair 2009, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-1536-2-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-1536-2-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-1536</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/3/1/2">
        <title>Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in primary human bronchial epithelial cells is Smad-dependent and enhanced by fibronectin and TNF-alpha</title>
        <description>Background:
Defective epithelial repair, excess fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, collagen overproduction and fibrosis occur in a number of respiratory diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pulmonary fibrosis. Pathological conversion of epithelial cells into fibroblasts (epithelial-mesenchymal transition, EMT) has been proposed as a mechanism for the increased fibroblast numbers and has been demonstrated to occur in lung alveolar epithelial cells. Whether other airway cell types also have the capability to undergo EMT has been less explored so far. A better understanding of the full extent of EMT in airways, and the underlying mechanisms, can provide important insights into airway disease pathology and enable the development of new therapies. The main aim of this study was to test whether primary human bronchial epithelial cells are able to undergo EMT in vitro and to investigate the effect of various profibrotic factors in the process.
Results:
Our data demonstrate that primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) are able to undergo EMT in response to transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-&#946;1), as revealed by typical morphological alterations and EMT marker progression at the RNA level by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and, at the protein level, by western blot. By using pharmacological inhibitors we show that this is a Smad-dependent mechanism and is independent of extracellular signal-related kinase pathway activation. Additional cytokines and growth factors such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-&#945;), interleukin-1 beta (IL1&#946;) and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) were also tested, alone or in combination with TGF-&#946;1. TNF-&#945; markedly enhances the effect of TGF-&#946;1 on EMT, whereas IL1&#946; shows only a very weak effect and CTGF has no significant effect. We have also found that cell-matrix contact, in particular to fibronectin, an ECM component upregulated in fibrotic lesions, potentiates EMT in both human alveolar epithelial cells and HBECs. Furthermore, we also show that the collagen discoidin domain receptor 1 (DDR1), generally expressed in epithelial cells, is downregulated during the EMT of bronchial epithelium whereas DDR2 is unaffected. Our results also suggest that bone morphogenetic protein-4 is likely to have a context dependent effect during the EMT of HBECs, being able to induce the expression of EMT markers and, at the same time, to inhibit TGF-&#946; induced epithelial transdifferentiation.
Conclusions:
The results presented in this study provide additional insights into EMT, a potentially very important mechanism in fibrogenesis. We show that, in addition to alveolar epithelial type II cells, primary HBECs are also able to undergo EMT in vitro upon TGF-&#946;1 stimulation via a primarily Smad 2/3 dependent mechanism. The effect of TGF-&#946;1 is potentiated on fibronectin matrix and in the presence of TNF-&#945;, representing a millieu reminiscent of fibrotic lesions. Our results can contribute to a better understanding of lung fibrosis and to the development of new therapeutic approaches.</description>
        <link>http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/3/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Joana Camara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gabor Jarai</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair 2010, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-1536-3-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-1536-3-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-1536</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/4/1/26">
        <title>Animal models for investigating chronic pancreatitis</title>
        <description>Chronic pancreatitis is defined as a continuous or recurrent inflammatory disease of the pancreas characterized by progressive and irreversible morphological changes. It typically causes pain and permanent impairment of pancreatic function. In chronic pancreatitis areas of focal necrosis are followed by perilobular and intralobular fibrosis of the parenchyma, by stone formation in the pancreatic duct, calcifications in the parenchyma as well as the formation of pseudocysts. Late in the course of the disease a progressive loss of endocrine and exocrine function occurs.  Despite advances in understanding the pathogenesis no causal treatment  for chronic pancreatitis is presently available. Thus, there is a need for well characterized animal models for further investigations which allow translation to the human situation. This review summarizes existing experimental models and distinguishes them according to the type of pathological stimulus used for induction of pancreatitis. There is a special focus on pancreatic duct ligation, repetitive overstimulation with caerulein and chronic alcohol feeding. Secondly, attention is drawn to genetic models that have recently been generated and which mimic features of chronic pancreatitis in man. Each technique will be supplemented with data on the pathophysiological background of the model and their limitations will be discussed.</description>
        <link>http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/4/1/26</link>
                <dc:creator>Alexander Aghdassi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julia Mayerle</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sandra Christochowitz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Frank Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Matthias Sendler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Markus Lerch</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair 2011, null:26</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-1536-4-26</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-1536-4-26-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-1536</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/4/1/4">
        <title>Cooperative interaction of CTGF and TGF-beta in animal models of fibrotic disease</title>
        <description>Background:
Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is widely thought to promote the development of fibrosis in collaboration with transforming growth factor (TGF)-&#946;; however, most of the evidence for its involvement comes from correlative and culture-based studies. In this study, the importance of CTGF in tissue fibrosis was directly examined in three murine models of fibrotic disease: a novel model of multiorgan fibrosis induced by repeated intraperitoneal injections of CTGF and TGF-&#946;2; the unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) renal fibrosis model; and an intratracheal bleomycin instillation model of pulmonary fibrosis.
Results:
Intraperitoneal coadministration of CTGF and TGF-&#946;2 elicited a profound fibrotic response that was inhibited by the human anti-CTGF antibody FG-3019, as indicated by the ability of FG-3019 to ameliorate the histologic signs of fibrosis and reduce the otherwise increased hydroxyproline:proline (Hyp:Pro) ratios by 25% in kidney (P &lt; 0.05), 30% in liver (P &lt; 0.01) and 63% in lung (P &lt; 0.05). Moreover, administration of either cytokine alone failed to elicit a fibrotic response, thus demonstrating that CTGF is both necessary and sufficient to initiate fibrosis in the presence of TGF-&#946; and vice versa. In keeping with this requirement for CTGF function in fibrosis, FG-3019 also reduced the renal Hyp:Pro response up to 20% after UUO (P &lt; 0.05). In bleomycin-injured animals, a similar trend towards a FG-3019 treatment effect was observed (38% reduction in total lung Hyp, P = 0.056). Thus, FG-3019 antibody treatment consistently reduced excessive collagen deposition and the pathologic severity of fibrosis in all models.
Conclusion:
Cooperative interactions between CTGF and TGF-&#946; signaling are required to elicit overt tissue fibrosis. This interdependence and the observed anti-fibrotic effects of FG-3019 indicate that anti-CTGF therapy may provide therapeutic benefit in different forms of fibroproliferative disease.</description>
        <link>http://www.fibrogenesis.com/content/4/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Qingjian Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Usinger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Blake Nichols</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julia Gray</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leon Xu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Todd Seeley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mitch Brenner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Guangjie Guo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Weihua Zhang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Noelynn Oliver</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Al Lin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Yeowell</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair 2011, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-1536-4-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-1536-4-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Fibrogenesis &amp; Tissue Repair</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-1536</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-02-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

